Points to Remember:
- Land revenue as the primary source.
- Importance of ports and trade.
- Role of different social groups in revenue collection.
- Absence of a centralized, unified system.
- Regional variations in revenue practices.
Introduction:
The Sangam period (c. 300 BCE â 300 CE) in South India witnessed the flourishing of several independent kingdoms and chiefdoms. Unlike the later empires with centralized administrative structures, the Sangam era lacked a unified revenue system. Instead, revenue collection was decentralized and varied significantly across different regions and kingdoms, reflecting the socio-political landscape of the time. Literary sources like the Sangam poems, along with archaeological findings, provide fragmented but valuable insights into their revenue mechanisms. Understanding this system requires analyzing the primary sources and interpreting them within the context of the prevailing social and economic structures.
Body:
1. Land Revenue as the Backbone:
The primary source of revenue for Sangam-era kingdoms was land revenue. Land ownership was complex, involving various forms of tenure. The king was considered the ultimate owner of the land, but it was often granted to individuals or groups in exchange for services or taxes. These grants could be hereditary or temporary. The Sangam literature mentions different types of land, including arable land, pastureland, and forest land, each likely subject to different tax rates or obligations. The exact methods of assessment and collection remain unclear, but it likely involved a combination of sharecropping, fixed payments, and labor services.
2. The Role of Ports and Trade:
Coastal regions in South India played a crucial role in the economy. Major ports like Muziris thrived on international trade, generating significant revenue for the ruling powers. Customs duties levied on imported and exported goods formed a substantial part of the royal income. The Sangam poems frequently mention the bustling trade activities and the wealth generated from these ports, indicating their importance in the revenue structure. This revenue stream was likely managed by port officials appointed by the ruling powers.
3. Social Stratification and Revenue Collection:
The Sangam society was characterized by a rigid social hierarchy. Different social groups, including the Brahmins, Vellalas (landowning agriculturists), and other castes, played distinct roles in revenue collection. While the exact nature of their involvement is debated, it’s likely that the higher castes held positions of authority in the revenue administration, collecting taxes and managing resources on behalf of the rulers. The poems suggest that the system was not always equitable, with the burden of taxation falling disproportionately on certain sections of society.
4. Decentralized Nature and Regional Variations:
The absence of a centralized empire meant that revenue systems varied significantly across different regions and kingdoms. Each kingdom likely had its own methods of assessment, collection, and administration. The Sangam literature reflects this diversity, providing glimpses into the practices of individual kingdoms and chiefdoms, but not a unified national system. This decentralized nature makes it challenging to create a comprehensive picture of the Sangam revenue system.
Conclusion:
The revenue system of South India during the Sangam period was primarily based on land revenue, supplemented by income from port duties and trade. The system was decentralized and lacked uniformity, reflecting the political fragmentation of the era. While land ownership was complex, with various forms of tenure, the king was considered the ultimate owner. Social stratification played a significant role in revenue collection, with different castes having varying levels of involvement. The available evidence, primarily from Sangam literature, provides fragmented insights, making it difficult to reconstruct a complete picture. Further research, integrating archaeological findings and epigraphic evidence, is crucial to gain a more comprehensive understanding of this crucial aspect of Sangam-era society. A focus on interdisciplinary research, combining textual analysis with archaeological and epigraphic data, will provide a more nuanced and complete understanding of the Sangam revenue system and its impact on the socio-economic fabric of South India. This approach will contribute to a more holistic understanding of the past and its relevance to contemporary issues of governance and resource management.
CGPCS Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for CGPCS Prelims and CGPCS Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by CGPCS Notes are as follows:-