Points to Remember:
- The Tendulkar Committee’s poverty line definition.
- Methodology used for calculation.
- Criticisms and limitations of the methodology.
- Comparison with other poverty line estimations.
- Implications of the definition for poverty alleviation programs.
Introduction:
The estimation of poverty in India is a complex and contentious issue. Various methodologies have been employed over the years, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. One significant attempt to define the poverty line was undertaken by the Tendulkar Committee, officially known as the Expert Group to Examine the Methodology for Estimation of Poverty (2009). This committee, chaired by Professor Suresh D. Tendulkar, aimed to revise the existing poverty line methodology, which was widely criticized for underestimating the extent of poverty in the country. The committee’s report significantly influenced government policies related to poverty alleviation for several years.
Body:
1. Methodology of the Tendulkar Committee:
The Tendulkar Committee adopted a mixed approach, combining both calorie-based and non-calorie-based indicators to define the poverty line. Unlike previous methods that primarily relied on minimum calorie intake, this committee incorporated a broader range of factors.
- Calorie-based measure: The committee recommended a daily per capita calorie intake of 2400 kcal in rural areas and 2100 kcal in urban areas. These figures were based on the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) recommendations, but adjusted to reflect actual consumption patterns.
- Non-calorie-based measure: Recognizing that poverty encompasses more than just food consumption, the committee included expenditure on non-food items like clothing, footwear, education, and healthcare. A weighted average of calorie and non-calorie components was used to arrive at the poverty line. The weights assigned to these components were based on the National Sample Survey (NSS) data.
2. Poverty Line Estimates:
Using this methodology, the Tendulkar Committee estimated poverty rates significantly lower than those calculated using the earlier methods (Planning Commission’s 1999-2000 methodology). However, it still indicated a substantial portion of the Indian population living below the poverty line. The exact figures varied depending on the year and data used, but generally showed a decline in poverty rates compared to previous estimates.
3. Criticisms and Limitations:
Despite its improvements over previous methodologies, the Tendulkar Committee’s approach faced considerable criticism:
- Regional variations: Critics argued that the uniform calorie requirement across different regions failed to account for variations in climate, physical activity levels, and dietary habits.
- Price variations: The committee’s methodology did not adequately address the significant variations in prices across different states and regions, potentially leading to inaccurate poverty estimates.
- Subjectivity in weighting: The weights assigned to calorie and non-calorie components were subject to debate and could influence the final poverty estimates.
- Underestimation of poverty: Many scholars argued that even the Tendulkar Committee’s estimates underestimated the true extent of poverty, particularly multidimensional poverty aspects like access to education, healthcare, and sanitation.
4. Comparison with other poverty line estimations:
The Tendulkar Committee’s poverty line was compared with other estimations, including those by the Rangarajan Committee (2014), which proposed a higher poverty line. These differences highlight the inherent challenges and complexities in accurately measuring poverty. The debate continues on the most appropriate methodology and the resulting implications for policy-making.
Conclusion:
The Tendulkar Committee’s definition of the poverty line represented a significant advancement in methodology compared to its predecessors by incorporating non-food expenditure. However, its limitations, particularly concerning regional variations and price differentials, remain a subject of ongoing debate. While the committee’s work provided valuable insights, the ongoing challenge lies in developing a more robust and comprehensive methodology that accurately captures the multidimensional nature of poverty in India. Future poverty estimations should strive for greater regional specificity, incorporate a broader range of indicators, and account for the dynamic nature of poverty. A holistic approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative data, is crucial for effective poverty alleviation programs and the achievement of sustainable development goals. Ultimately, a continuous refinement of methodologies, informed by rigorous research and data analysis, is essential for ensuring that policies effectively address the needs of the most vulnerable populations and uphold the constitutional values of equality and social justice.
CGPCS Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for CGPCS Prelims and CGPCS Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by CGPCS Notes are as follows:-