Points to Remember:
- The phrase “Procedure established by Law” (PEL) is a crucial concept in constitutional law, particularly concerning fundamental rights.
- It guarantees due process and prevents arbitrary state action.
- The interpretation of PEL varies across jurisdictions and legal systems.
- It’s not merely about the existence of a law, but the fairness and reasonableness of the procedure.
Introduction:
The phrase “Procedure established by Law” (PEL) is a cornerstone of many constitutional democracies, safeguarding individual rights against arbitrary state action. It’s a legal principle that ensures that any deprivation of a person’s rights must follow a fair and just process defined by law. Unlike the American concept of “due process of law,” which emphasizes inherent fairness, PEL focuses on the existence of a pre-defined legal procedure. The exact meaning and scope of PEL, however, are subject to ongoing judicial interpretation and differ across jurisdictions. The Supreme Court of India, for instance, has extensively engaged with the interpretation of Article 21, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, and incorporates the concept of PEL.
Body:
1. Meaning and Interpretation of PEL:
PEL doesn’t simply mean that there is a law authorizing the state’s action. It mandates that the procedure must be:
- Defined by Law: The procedure must be clearly laid down in a statute or other legally binding instrument. It cannot be arbitrary or left to the discretion of the executive.
- Just, Fair, and Reasonable: The procedure must be fair and reasonable in its application. It should provide adequate safeguards against arbitrariness and ensure that the individual has a chance to be heard.
- Accessible and Transparent: The procedure should be accessible to the affected individual and transparent in its operation. Individuals should be aware of their rights and the steps involved in the procedure.
2. Distinction from “Due Process of Law”:
While both PEL and “due process of law” aim to protect against arbitrary state action, they differ in their emphasis. “Due process” focuses on inherent fairness and substantive justice, while PEL emphasizes the existence of a pre-defined legal procedure. The former is more flexible and allows for judicial review of the inherent fairness of the procedure, whereas the latter relies more heavily on the existence of a legally established procedure.
3. Judicial Interpretation of PEL (Indian Context):
The Supreme Court of India has played a significant role in shaping the interpretation of PEL, primarily through its interpretation of Article 21. The Court has consistently held that Article 21’s guarantee of life and personal liberty includes the right to a fair and just procedure. Several landmark judgments have emphasized the need for procedural fairness, including the right to be heard, the right to legal representation, and the right to access to justice. For example, cases concerning preventive detention have highlighted the need for clear and specific grounds for detention and the right to challenge the detention before a court.
4. Challenges and Criticisms:
Despite its importance, PEL faces challenges:
- Vagueness of Laws: Sometimes, laws defining procedures are vague or ambiguous, leaving room for arbitrary interpretation.
- Lack of Access to Justice: Even when procedures exist, lack of access to legal aid and resources can render them ineffective for marginalized communities.
- Potential for Abuse: Procedures can be designed in a way that favors the state, undermining the protection intended by PEL.
Conclusion:
“Procedure established by Law” is a vital constitutional safeguard against arbitrary state action. It ensures that any deprivation of rights follows a fair, just, and reasonable procedure defined by law. While the interpretation of PEL varies across jurisdictions, the core principle remains the same: to prevent arbitrary exercise of power and to protect individual rights. To strengthen the effectiveness of PEL, it’s crucial to ensure clarity and accessibility of laws, provide adequate legal aid, and promote judicial oversight to prevent abuse. A robust and transparent legal framework, coupled with an independent judiciary, is essential to ensure that PEL truly serves its purpose of protecting fundamental rights and upholding the rule of law, promoting a just and equitable society. This approach fosters a holistic development that respects constitutional values and ensures sustainable progress for all citizens.
CGPCS Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for CGPCS Prelims and CGPCS Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by CGPCS Notes are as follows:-